|
First of all this is not just about one posting or any one person. A scenario: Someone posts to a community in good faith trying honestly to be helpful or to state their opinion on an issue. They state and make it clear that they are explaining how thing appear from their point of view A person in authority then takes it upon themselves not to just disagree but to imply the original poster is either not posting in good faith or is just in some way incompetent. The posting they make says that the first person's view is invalid, that they have no right to express it. That it is just not true, factually inaccurate. How does the original poster respond? Taking advice from the discussions with Nancy White in the Hotseat OK so this is good advice. It is possible that some people's writing style just gets under your skin, rings your bells, maybe yours does that to the other person. However, not responding is not going to change the way this person reacts. They will just carry on reacting in this way if unchallenged and you will go on being upset by their responses. Not only that but other people may be discouraged from posting in case the same thing happens to them. So what are the other options? So where does the original poster go from here? |
| Eve July 28, 2004 10:58 PM PDT "just in some way incompetent. " has happened to me - my response was to ask why they said what they said - deafening silence! So - I'm still not sure what I said wrong - if indeed I did in the first place. Not sure where this fits in with your listings! | ||
| Shirley July 14, 2004 09:31 PM PDT Hi Linda, sometimes I find its such a huge challenge that just assuming good intent isn't enough. A bit like ordinary conversations which can also turn chilly, then there's nothing to do except walk away and come back to the subject with a cool head if the subject is worth revisiting. I hope you're OK now. | ||
| Leave a Comment: |